Quantcast
Channel: Huffington Post India
Viewing all 37249 articles
Browse latest View live

Why The #MeToo Movement Left Me Overwhelmed, And Should Be A Wake-Up Call For Other Men Too

$
0
0

India ushered in 2017 with a shocking incident of mass molestation of women who were out on the streets of Bengaluru to greet the new year. Instead of festive mirth, the occasion became tainted for them by an ugliness all too pervasive in this country's public life.

Headlines screaming out barbarities perpetrated on women are ubiquitous in the Indian media. Cities and towns here proudly appear in lists of the most unsafe places in the world for women travellers. Patriarchy is what we breathe in the air here, mixed with a noxious dose of vehicular pollution. And not much seems to change even after repeated outbursts of public protest.

Over the past few days, women across the world have been reliving their own Harvey Weinstein moments on Twitter, since allegations of sexual harassment against the Hollywood producer spilled out in the open. In India, similar allegations against Khodu Irani, the owner of a popular bar in Pune called High Spirits, led to an outpouring of #MeToo stories of women's struggle to be heard.

Within hours of reports of harassment pouring in from people who have been to the bar for years, women, especially those with access to social networking sites, began speaking up. A litany of voices rose, loud and clear.

Not only did women condemn the incidents at High Spirits, they also started sharing personal stories of harassment, abuse, intimidation and much worse that they have lived with, more often than not silently, for years. As their voices flooded the Internet, a spirit of solidarity spread like a wildfire.

But confronted with this unified show of resistance, which should have ideally shattered divides of gender, a group of men decided to speak up on social media as well — not to add their voices to condemn violence against women but to say that #NotAllMen are culpable of such crimes.

If mansplaining is a bad enough manifestation of the unthinking privilege a majority of men internalise in the course of their lives, this righteous self-defence exposed a daftness surpassing any other.

The misplaced priority of these 'aggrieved' men invited the scorn of many, but such patterns of thinking are hard to get rid of. And the proof of such impervious male chauvinism is here as, once again, we witness the sordid dance of the fragile Indian male ego.

READ: Can We Please Stop The Vast, Bottomless Stupidity That Is #NotAllMen?

A sorry bunch of men, in India and elsewhere, have armed themselves with ridicule, supercilious self-worth or plain bile to counter the worldwide chorus of women of various ethnicities, sexual orientations and ages speaking out against their abusers — past, present and future.

That's as sad a reflection on the male gender as a whole as it can get, enough to make any member of the species cringe.

As a man, I've been overwhelmed by the sheer number of women on my social media timelines who have invoked the #MeToo hashtag to claim their stakes in calling out gendered violence.

As a man, I've been overwhelmed by the sheer number of women on my social media timelines — friends, family members, colleagues, strangers, acquaintances — who have invoked the #MeToo hashtag to join an army out there on the Internet, claiming their stakes in calling out gendered violence.

Some spoke of their ordeal not for the first time in public, others broke a painful silence they have preserved for years, if not decades. Every time a new message popped up on my phone or computer screen, I felt a stab of despair.

Women I have known for years, forged close friendships and formed bonds of trust with, spoke of private traumas in public for the first time. At long last, this was contrary to the social ethos we had grown up in, encumbered with a value system where to speak out against injustice was unnatural. Silence is golden, it helps perpetuate the patriarchal order of things.

There are many who may be sceptical of a politics that speaks itself through hashtags — perhaps rightly so. It's easy, even flippant, to type it out and hit post, they say, it doesn't make the slightest difference to the world.

Or does it?

Here's an analogy for men who are cynical of the hashtag exercise: Imagine letting go of a memory you've held tightly inside, like your breath underwater, for decades, and then the sense of relief, as you come up for air, the relief of inhaling freely again.

For me, one silver lining, for the lack of a better phrase, in this episode has been to encounter a number of men on my timeline also posting #MeToo stories, breaking the taboo that is sexual violence against men in India.

A HuffPost India report highlighted earlier this year the culture of silence around male victims of sexual violence in India and its endemic grasp over society. And as the #MeToo movement shows, the shame and stigma associated with being victims of sexual harassment can only be defeated by a reactive culture of fearless speech — against the perpetrators who commit these crimes as well as those who urge people to hold their silence.

Sexual violence doesn't discriminate, though historically, women and children, have mostly borne the brunt of it. But in a society like India, where patriarchy is written into the very fabric of communal living, men can become easy targets of hate, too, for refusing to endorse a toxic ethos of masculinity.

PHOTOS: 'End The Isolation' Around Male Child Sexual Abuse, Say Survivors Of Assault

In India, now more than ever perhaps, a man's refusal to entertain locker-room talk or his stand against the objectification of women is likely to be derided by the majority of his kind — for whom all-male WhatsApp groups, dripping with sexism, are but an extension of their male privilege, sealed by the approval of many generations of social engineering.

Making a misogynistic remark is often as routine an affair as manspreading on public transport. Look no further than Bollywood for validation.

No wonder such conditioning has spawned hashtag battles, with even so-called 'woke' men busy drawing the attention back to themselves from a social evil that members of their own sex are complicit in.

No wonder such conditioning has spawned hashtag battles, with even so-called 'woke' men busy drawing the attention back to themselves from a social evil that members of their own sex are complicit in. Instead of listening to the #MeToo testimonies with the care and respect they deserve, being stung by the horror of it all, and introspecting on its larger implications, some men on social media came up with #NotAllMen as the answer to all their troubles.

It was enough for them to brandish their self-proclaimed virtues by claiming to treat women as members of their own family. The fate of all women, according to such logic, is to forever remain a mother, daughter sister or wife to men, never to exist individuals in their own right, as equal stakeholders in society.

Apart from making a stride in public perceptions of gender justice, at least among the urban elite and the generation that's growing up ensconced in social media, the #MeToo movement has shown men in India just how hard it is to leave their comfort zone, to give up the halo of entitlement, and begin to earn a real one.

Also on HuffPost


A Battle Of Biopics Is Brewing With Two Upcoming Films On NT Rama Rao

$
0
0

2018 will be the year of NT Rama Rao, 22 years after he passed away. And in what promises to be a double role of a different kind, two filmmakers are getting ready to present two biopics of the late Andhra chief minister.

But NTR vs Lakshmi's NTR isn't going to be yet another clash of two films at the box-office. It will be as much a political battle, for while NTR is likely to be a goody-goody look at his film career and successful entry into politics, Lakshmi's NTR will focus on the most controversial phase of the thespian's life starting 1993. The film will focus on the time he came in contact with Lakshmi Parvati, his marriage, his family's disapproval of his fawning over his much younger wife, the spectacular 1994 election victory, being overthrown by Chandrababu Naidu in the August 1995 coup and his death six months later, a heartbroken man.

And when the person wielding the megaphone for Lakshmi's NTR is maverick filmmaker Ramgopal Varma, the audience knows what to expect. Known to be controversy's favourite child, Varma has a knack of picking up subjects that will create more than just a ripple. His last few movies have seen him reprising many a real-life character, be it forest brigand Veerappan or Vangaveeti Mohana Ranga (Vangaveeti), the firebrand leader from Vijayawada. His Sarkar series have clear shades of Bal Thackeray and he has already cut his teeth in Rayalaseema politics by presenting the life and times of factionist politician Paritala Ravi (Rakta Charithra). Among his Hindi movies, the underworld and Dawood Ibrahim (Company)have always fascinated Varma.

The two movies will also see the two sides of the NTR family crossing swords.

The two movies will also see the two sides of the NTR family crossing swords. While Lakshmi's NTR, as the title suggests, will have Lakshmi Parvati in a dominant role, NTR to be directed by Teja is being produced with the consent of the family, that includes the sons, daughters and son-in-law Naidu. It will most likely also see NTR's actor son Nandamuri Balakrishna (who is also related to Naidu as his daughter Brahmani is now married to Naidu's son Nara Lokesh) play the role of his father. So anything that shows Naidu in a poor light is almost ruled out.

Given that Balakrishna also is in politics now (he is a Telugu Desam MLA from Hindupur), the NTR biopic is likely to be presented in such a manner that it sets the tone for the 2019 polls. The problem will be that Varma's venture has the potential to nullify the positives of Balakrishna's NTR, as Lakshmi's NTR is unlikely to be flattering to the men behind the 1995 coup.

But is NTR really a factor in current day politics of Andhra Pradesh? Though the TDP founder leader has been reduced to a bust, statue and cutout in the party, Naidu has also kept his memory and legacy alive by naming welfare projects after him. It does not mean that NTR is still a vote catcher because the first-time voters are not even likely to know much about him. For them, TDP is Chandrababu Naidu.

But while invoking NTR as Balakrishna plans to do, is unlikely to net new votes, at the same time, presenting a negative image can boomerang. That is where Varma has to be extremely careful though he has projected himself as an admirer of NTR and claims to have been part of the crowd that attended NTR's first political meeting in Vijayawada in the early 80s. Lakshmi's NTR is being bankrolled by Rakesh Reddy, who is a leader with the YSR Congress party, the principal political challenger to the TDP in Andhra Pradesh. If NTR is shown as a weak person, it could well be exploited by the TDP to rake up an anti-Telugu pride sentiment given respect for NTR is pretty much part of the Telugu ethos and culture. The NTR vs NTR clash will therefore also be a TDP vs YSR Congress duel.

Teja's NTR is likely to take more time as he is committed to finish a movie with actor Venkatesh before he deepdives into NTR's life and times.

For biopics to succeed, the script writer and director need to have the surprise element with enough meat in the story to surprise the audience. The movie needs to have material the viewer did not know about. But in the case of NTR, a lot about his film and political life is already out in the public domain. What will be on test is how Varma presents the turbulent last year of NTR's life.

Like he did in the case of Veerappan, Varma has zeroed in on an entirely new face to be his NT Rama Rao. Kept under wraps, Varma believes an actor who has been seen in other roles before will prevent the audience from seeing him as NTR. Teja's NTR is likely to take more time as he is committed to finish a movie with actor Venkatesh before he deepdives into NTR's life and times.

Varma's films have a history of facing hurdles at release time. The Vangaveeti family was not happy with the manner in which the film had shaped up and Veerappan's wife had gone to court demanding a ban on the movie's release. In this case, Varma will be up against a more formidable political force should he present Naidu and company in a poor light. That could even jeopardise the release of the film. But given that Varma thrives on pre-release buzz, this may just be playing out according to script.

Taj Mahal Is Important, Doesn't Matter Who Built It, Says Yogi Adityanath

$
0
0

LUCKNOW -- In a bid to stem the row over the Taj Mahal, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Tuesday said the famed monument in Agra was built "by the blood and sweat of Indian labourers". An official said he will also visit the Taj.

"It does not matter who built it and for what reason. It was built by the blood and sweat of Indian labourers," the Chief Minister said of the 17th century marble monument which is India's biggest tourist draw.

The statement came after Uttar Pradesh BJP legislator Sangeet Som sparked national outrage by calling the Mughal-built Taj Mahal a blot on Indian culture.

Adityanath said the monument of love was important for the Uttar Pradesh government, specially "from the tourism perspective" and "it is our priority to provide facilities and safety to tourists there".

Adityanath is scheduled to visit the Taj Mahal, Agra Fort, Fatehpur Sikri and other important monuments in Agra on October 26, an official told IANS.

The Taj was built by Mughal emperor Shahjahan in memory of his wife Mumtaz. Considered one of the wonders of the world, it attracts millions of Indian and foreign tourists every year.

Last month, the Uttar Pradesh government had omitted references to the Taj in a booklet published on the completion of six months of the Adityanath government.

Pakistani-Led International Gang Selling Bank Details Of Indians Online For ₹500, Say MP Police

$
0
0
Representative image.

An international gang operating out of Lahore is allegedly selling bank details of Indians for ₹500, according to an investigation done by the Madhya Pradesh cyber cell, reported The Times of India.

According to the report, a Pakistani national leads the international gang, where they sell credit and debit card details of Indians, including the CVV numbers, on the dark web. The cops were on the trail of a case where an Indian banking official had complained that ₹72,401 had been wrongfully debited from his credit card in August.

The investigation in the case led them to two Indian gang members in Mumbai. The arrested men reportedly bought hacked credit cards online on the dark web using Bitcoin. They have allegedly used ₹20,00,000 using 17 such hacked credit cards, sending half the amount to the ringleader, who is believed to be a man named Shaikh Afzal alias Shozi Lahore.

"We have learnt that Shozi is a native of Lahore and got married only last year," Superintendent of Police (SP) of State Cyber Cell of Indore unit, Jitendra Singh told Business Today. "Shozi visits different countries across the world. He was in Uzbekistan when Nadar and Pillai talked to him last time through Skype. We are trying to confirm these details."

Also On HuffPost:

Karnataka Man Drags Vaastu Agency To Court After It Fails To Bring Him Good Luck

$
0
0

A man from north Karnataka has taken an agency to court after, paying them money, he changed the 'vaastu' of his home, but it brought him no luck.

The Hindu reports that Mahadev Dudihal, who works with a legal firm, used the Consumer Protection Act against a firm whom he paid Rs ₹11,600 two years ago for advice on remodelling his home for better vaastu so that his three daughters would get married.

However, the report suggests that despite spending a whopping Rs 5 lakh to re-arrange his home, Dudihal's daughters remained unmarried, despite a promise of changes taking place within three to eight months.

Dudihal had contacted the firm after seeing an advertisement on TV.

The Hindu reports that he first filed a case under the Consumer Protection Act, the district forum told him that it did not fall under its purview, so he has now approached the state forum.

Vaastu Shastra, which literally translates to meaning the "science of architecture' is an ancient Hindu method of arranging once home so that it brings good luck. While there are several books and practitioners on it, it does not seem to have any scientific basis.

'Congress Equally Responsible For GST', Says PM Who Called It A 'Landmark Achievement' During July Launch

$
0
0
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (L) addresses a gathering of Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) supporters during Gujarat Gaurav Mahasamellan at Bhaat village on the outskirts of Ahmedabad on October 16, 2017.

Gandhinagar – Prime Minister Narendra Modi today said Goods and Services Tax (GST) was a collective decision of various state governments in which the Centre had a small role to play and the Congress was "an equal partner".

"Congress is an equal partner in GST decision and it should not spread lies about GST. The decision was not taken by Parliament or Narendra Modi. The decision was made by governments of all political parties, including the Congress governments of Punjab, Karnataka, and Meghalaya," Modi said.

"Congress is an equal partner in GST decision and it should not spread lies about GST."

He said the central government was "only the 30th part" in the decision which was taken in consultation with 29 states.

"You are equally responsible for the decision," he said while addressing a huge rally of BJP party workers in poll-bound Gujarat at Bhat village here.

Modi said he has been in touch with businessmen after the launch of the GST and claimed they like the system because it has freed them from bureaucratic red tape.

He said, as promised, his government reviewed the way the new indirect tax regime was working after three months following which several changes were made to fulfil their demands.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (C/R) and Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) President Amitbhai Shah (2nd L), wave to the supporters on their arrival at Gujarat Gaurav Mahasamellan at Bhaat village on the outskirts of Ahmedabad on October 16, 2017.

Modi also assured the business community that the government is trying to sort out problems they are still facing.

"I am sure that businessmen of the country need this system, but they demand simplicity. This is being put before the GST (Council) and discussed collectively," he said.

He also tried to assuage the concerns of the trading community about penal action they might face for their past accounting. The prime minister said a "fear psychosis" was being created over the issue.

Modi said businessmen will not need to adjust their past books to synchronise them with the new system.

He also attacked the Congress over observing November 8, the day demonetisation was announced last year, as "black day", something which his government would celebrate as "black money mukti diwas" (day of freedom from black money).

Modi said following demonetisation the sources of origin of Rs 3 lakh crore of dubious money are being probed and his government has shut down 2.10 lakh companies without any protest.

"So far we have shut down 2.10 lakh companies and there has been no protest or burning of Modi's effigy," he said.

Maisie Williams Has The Best Reaction To Sophie Turner's Engagement News

$
0
0

Game of Thrones” actress Maisie Williams couldn’t be happier about her co-star and best friend Sophie Turner’s engagement to musician Joe Jonas.

Turner announced the news via Instagram over the weekend, and Williams reacted with this adorable post:

Congratulations to my beautiful girlfriend on her engagement,” she wrote on Monday, alongside a snap of Turner’s engagement ring.

“This is just one of MANY life milestones we’ll share,” Williams added.

The heartfelt message delighted thousands of her fans. Her addition of the #jophie hashtag, however, captivated them even more.

By reworking the #mophie hashtag that she and Turner regularly use, she appeared to signal her approval.

Also on HuffPost
How To Pronounce The Names Of "Game Of Thrones" Characters

Kerala HC Upholds BCCI Appeal, Sreesanth's Life Ban To Stay

$
0
0

KOCHI -- In what could be a shocking blow to former Indian pacer S. Sreesanth, a division bench of the Kerala high court on Tuesday upheld the appeal made by the BCCI against the earlier single bench verdict that lifted the life ban on the bowler in August this year.

The division bench of Chief Justice Navniti Prasad Singh ruled that the court cannot conduct a judicial review on the life ban imposed by the BCCI and hence upheld the appeal.

The court heard the appeal petition for the past two days and delivered its verdict, which has now for the time being ended his hopes of not just playing for Kerala Ranji side in its upcoming matches but also to take part in practise sessions at any place that comes under the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) or any state cricket association.

Speaking to the media, Kerala Cricket Association secretary Jayesh George said the KCA was supporting Sreesanth ever since the ban was lifted.

"We had made arrangements for him to undergo a full fitness test so as to make him match fit. Now with this verdict, we will now have to respect it," said George.

Now the only option before Sreesanth is to approach the apex court and, according to sources close to the bowler, he is likely to go in appeal against this verdict.

In 2015, the now 34-year-old pacer along with two other players got exonerated by the Delhi court in the case registered by Delhi Police which invoked the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), but the BCCI Disciplinary Committee headed by the present Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley slapped a life ban on Sreesanth.

Following this, he approached the Kerala HC, which on August 7 lifted the life ban.


George Saunders Wins Man Booker Prize For Debut Novel, Lincoln In The Bardo

$
0
0
Author George Saunders poses for photographs during a photo-call in London for the six Man Booker shortlisted fiction authors, on the eve of the prize giving in London.

American author George Saunders has won the prestigious Man Booker Prize for fiction with “Lincoln in the Bardo,” a polyphonic symphony of a novel about restless souls adrift in the afterlife.

The story of President Abraham Lincoln visiting the body of his 11-year-old son Willie in a Washington cemetery, it is narrated by a chorus of characters who are all dead, but unwilling or unable to let go of life.

Baroness Lola Young, who chaired the judging panel, praised “its innovation, its very different styling, the way in which it paradoxically brought to life these almost-dead souls.”

Saunders was awarded the prize Tuesday by Prince Charles’ wife Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall at London’s medieval Guildhall.

It is the second year in a row an American has won the 50,000 pound ($66,000) prize, which was opened to U.S. authors in 2014.

Roy Price, Amazon Studios Head, Quits Amid Sexual Harassment Claim

$
0
0

Roy Price resigned as head of Amazon Studios on Tuesday, just days after a producer for one of the company’s hit shows went on the record to say he’d harassed her.

An Amazon Studios spokeswoman confirmed Price’s resignation to HuffPost, but said “there is no statement at this time.”

In a story published last week, Isa Hackett, a producer for “The Man in the High Castle,” told The Hollywood Reporter that Price had repeatedly propositioned her for sex after she’d spent the day promoting the show at the San Diego Comic-Con in July 2015.

According to Hackett, she and Price were riding in a cab together when he tried to coerce her into sex, saying “You will love my dick.” Hackett said that Price later stepped close to her at a party and said “anal sex” in her ear while she talked to executive producers. She refused Price’s advances and told him that she was a married lesbian with children, she said.

Hackett told THR that she had reported the incident to Amazon executives immediately.

The allegations against Price first broke in August, when the investigative news site The Information published a story about Amazon’s investigation into Hackett’s claim. The company reportedly did not suspend Price during the investigation or after The Information’s story was published. It was only when Hackett spoke on the record about her experience that the company ousted Price.

Price, who declined to comment for the THR story, took a leave of absence shortly after the story came out on Thursday. HuffPost could not reach him for comment.

Hackett told THR that she was motivated to speak publicly about her experience with Price after the bombshellreports about producer Harvey Weinstein’s alleged sexual abuse of dozens of women made headlines earlier this month.

“As somebody with some power, I feel it is imperative for me to speak out,” Hackett told THR. “I want to call out [Price’s] behavior and also hold myself to a certain standard.”

Amid the controversy, Amazon Studios canceled an event promoting new shows this week, CNN reported.

Albert Cheng, who took over as the interim head of the studio last week, will continue to serve in that role now that Price is officially out.

“The Man in the High Castle” is based on the work of Hackett’s father, author Philip K. Dick.

Also on HuffPost
Celebrities React To Harvey Weinstein

This Woman Got A Wonder Woman Tattoo Over Her Double Mastectomy Scars

$
0
0

One woman channeled Wonder Woman in her preventative move against breast cancer.

Stephanie Kelly, a 42-year-old mother of four, recently underwent a double mastectomy surgery after testing positive for the BRCA1 gene mutation, which means she has an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Kelly told People that she wasn’t surprised when the test came back positive for BRCA1 because her mother has had breast cancer twice. 

“With the family history and just my general luck about things, I’d always expected breast cancer to play some role in my life,” she said. “It would have been a great surprise if it had been negative, but I completely expected to hear it was positive.” 

So Kelly turned to an iconic superhero to get her through the surgery: Wonder Woman.

“I have always loved Wonder Woman, and during this time I began to joke that I was going to be like Wonder Woman and be strong and unfazed by the things I needed to do that scared me,” she said. “Friends and family sent me little gifts of Wonder Woman figurines, cards, clothes, even a full robe. It all helped me feel stronger and it was a way to feel all the love and support I had and bring that along with me.” 

Due to other health complications, Kelly decided to not have breast reconstructive surgery. Instead, she opted to get a tattoo to cover her double mastectomy scars. She told People that in addition to Wonder Woman, she was also drawn to images of a phoenix. 

“I brought both of these ideas to my tattoo artist, Miss Jamie at Lovely Monkey in Whitmore Lake, Michigan, and she designed my amazing chest piece,” Kelly said. “I absolutely love it!”

Mastectomy tattoos have become a trend in the past few years, with many women getting them as a way to reclaim their bodies from cancer. 

Scroll below to see Kelly’s finished Wonder Woman tattoo. 

“With my other health issues, I’d never really been very confident of my body. But now, I already don’t fit the mold of what the world expects, so there is a sense of freedom that comes with that,” Kelly told People. “But then on top of this, I have this image of strength, power and fearlessness across my chest and that continues to build me up. I see my scars now as entirely positive.”

Head over to People to read the rest of Kelly’s story. 

The Most Powerful Journalist In Hollywood Protected Harvey Weinstein For Years

$
0
0
Harvey Weinstein and Peter Bart attend the launch party for Bart's book Infamous Players in New York City on April 25, 2011. 

In the mid-1990s, a young reporter at the entertainment trade magazine Variety pitched a story at the weekly meeting that would’ve made Harvey Weinstein look bad.

The pitch centered around the dangers of smaller movie companies moving into the production realm, and the reporter wanted to use Weinstein’s company, Miramax, as the prime example, since a number of its early forays into production had been less than successful.

But Peter Bart, the magazine’s powerful editor-in-chief, wasn’t impressed.

“Peter Bart shut that story down instantly, raised his voice and basically made sure that not only was that story not happening, but that I would never suggest anything similar again,” said the reporter ― who, like others interviewed by HuffPost for this story, didn’t want to be named because he still works “in the industry.”  

Some of the reporter’s other stories were also killed during his time at Variety, but for “the usual editorial reasons,” the reporter recalled. “That was the only time a story was rejected out of hand for no apparent reason other than the company it was about,” he said.

When everyone left the room, a colleague let the reporter in on one of the magazine’s unofficial policies. “We don’t do those kinds of stories about Miramax,” he recalled the colleague saying.

That sentiment was well-known at Variety, which was then one of the most highly influential institutions in Hollywood, another former Variety employee said. “You’d never find a critical piece about Harvey or about his company, which at the time was Miramax, in the paper. You just wouldn’t,” according to the employee. “It almost became the unspoken rule.”

The New York Times’ and New Yorker’s explosive investigations into Weinstein’s alleged sexual harassment and assault have spurred dozens of women to come forward with their own stories about Weinstein’s predation. So far, at least 35 women have accused Weinstein of rape, assault or sexual harassment.

The exposure of Hollywood’s most open of open secrets has led Weinstein’s accusers ― as well as their loved ones, journalists and those working in the industry ― to ask why, exactly, entertainment journalists preferred to cozy up to Weinstein instead of investigate him.

Part of the answer is that Weinstein was a master of manipulating the press ― sometimes strong-arming journalists and other times cajoling them, but either way bringing them into his field of influence.

Evidence of this could be seen even in the otherwise antagonistic coverage of Weinstein’s downfall, which treated the producer as the second coming of Sam Goldwyn. In truth, he was a better marketer of movies than a maker of them, and to elide the difference, he needed the help of journalists.

Bart, who at his height was one of the most powerful chroniclers of the film industry, was an eager and useful co-conspirator. Interviews with former reporters and editors at Variety describe him as one of Weinstein’s greatest protectors ― exactly the sort of enabler who helped to keep Weinstein’s “open secret” a secret for so long.

You’d never find a critical piece about Harvey or about his company, which at the time was Miramax, in the paper. You just wouldn’t. Former Variety employee

In 1989, Weinstein’s Miramax brought the film “Sex, Lies, and Videotape” to the Cannes Film Festival, where it won the Palme d’Or, the festival’s top honor. The moment helped Weinstein and his brother, Bob, burst onto the national scene ― two brash independent studio heads with a willingness to put out films other people weren’t, often to widespread acclaim.

That same year, Bart became the editor of Weekly Variety, and his career was intertwined with Weinstein’s from then on. Before his time at Variety, Bart had been a player in Hollywood’s golden age, helping to produce pictures like “Rosemary’s Baby” and “The Godfather.” He considered himself more a “statesman” of Hollywood than another lowly scribbler, as one former Variety editor explained.

Bart pushed to expand the publication’s footprint, transforming what had been a stodgy magazine into an influential powerhouse as he rose to the top of the masthead. Under his reign, page count increased, as did staff head count. Special sections that celebrated industry milestones (and of course, awards season), went from incidental to ubiquitous. “Everything was more,” explained Kinsey Lowe, a former news editor, who began at Variety in 1988 before Bart took over.

By the mid-1990s, Weinstein was one of the hottest names in Hollywood, and Bart was as tapped into the going-ons of the industry as anyone else. The powerful pair became close, developing a mutually beneficial relationship. Few publications gained more from Weinstein’s trick of turning an Oscar race into something like a sporting event. He provided Variety with loads of good copy during awards season, not to mention tons of ad revenue from Miramax and the bigger studios that wanted to keep up. “Chocolat” got a best picture nomination, and Variety got to boost its bottom line.

“He became the best friend of every media company,” said one veteran Hollywood insider of Weinstein, adding that there was a time when it was impossible to sift through an issue of Variety without being overwhelmed with Miramax advertisements.

In 1997, Michael Evans, the New York advertising sales director for the magazine, told The New York Times that Miramax had purchased about 40 percent of all Oscar ads in Variety’s weekly edition. “That was a huge source of income for Variety, and Variety of course needed the money,” said one employee. Two years later, while pushing the films “Life Is Beautiful” and “Shakespeare In Love” ― the latter of which eventually won the Oscar for best picture ― Miramax’s aggressive marketing changed the way Oscar campaigns were run.

They spent $3 million on the trades,” DreamWorks co-founder Jeffrey Katzenberg said at the time with some astonishment, before adding that his studio had been forced to increase its marketing budget in turn to keep up.

One former Variety staffer said Bart’s focus was on sales. “Ultimately, that’s what he cared about,” the staffer said. “He loved to buddy up to people. In particular with Harvey. It was about not upsetting one of his major advertisers.”

But not everyone agreed that advertising concerns caused Bart to treat Weinstein in any particular way. “Look, Miramax was a big client of ours, but they weren’t our biggest,” said former Variety publisher Charlie Koones, who ascribed the fat revenues of the 1990s to Bart’s editorial decisions.

Whatever the case, the end result was an editorial product that left many employees working under Bart feeling journalistically compromised. “If you look at the business end of it, Peter Bart was very good for Variety. But in terms of, for the news value, I don’t know about that,” said Lowe, the former news editor. “There was never anything bad said about Harvey Weinstein.”

[Bart] loved to buddy up to people. In particular with Harvey. It was about not upsetting one of his major advertisers. Former Variety staffer

In his own journalism, which was famously blunt and conversational, Bart was often quick to boost Weinstein. At the beginning of Oscar season in 1999, which Bart described as “Harvey Time,” he celebrated Weinstein’s ability to pull “rabbits out of his hat as rivals gnash their teeth and Oscar statuettes begin their inexorable march toward the Halls of Miramax.” Bart depicted Weinstein as a rebel with a cause (“And with a certain triumphant air, he lit another cigarette,” he once wrote of the producer) and applauded him when he criticized the use of “anonymous sources” in Premiere Magazine.

Bart stood up for Weinstein’s controversial Oscar win for “Shakespeare In Love.” And he was ready to play Weinstein’s hype man after a down year for Miramax. “Ever the steely realist, Harvey knows full well that last year’s hat trick cannot be repeated, and that the media can easily turn from worshipful to wicked,” Bart wrote in 1996.  

“Peter was enamored with Harvey,” recalled Leonard Klady, a former Variety reporter, in an interview with HuffPost.

Klady said that Bart never explicitly told him how to cover Miramax. Rex Weiner, a Los Angeles-based journalist and former Variety reporter who covered the indie film industry, said the same.

But, Weiner added, that didn’t mean employees didn’t know when to tiptoe. “It was not unknown at Variety that [Bart] had his friends in the business, and you had to be careful reporting on them,” Weiner said. “And conversely, he would say, ‘Go after somebody.’”

Other former Variety employees went further. One said that Bart would pull people off the Miramax beat if the coverage was too harsh. “He definitely was doing Harvey favors,” said the employee. “All the coverage was just golden.”

Another said that publicists would threaten reporters looking into negative stories about Miramax by saying, “All right, well Harvey’s just going to call Peter then.”

“And ultimately, you knew that was true, too, so you were neutered as a reporter right off the bat,” the former editor added.

Said a third former Variety staffer: “He had certain sacred cows, and one of them was Harvey Weinstein.” After a while, they said, reporters just learned to self-censor on the subject of Weinstein. When they didn’t, Bart just tweaked the stories to his liking.

“Writers and editors privately complained that he would sometimes rewrite or soften their stories, especially if the article were critical of his closest business friends, which included Miramax Films co-founder Harvey Weinstein,” the Los Angeles Times wrote of Bart in 2009.

Harvey Weinstein, Peter Bart and Mort Zuckerman celebrate the release of Bart's book Dangerous Company at the Four Seasons Hotel in New York City.

Bart let Weinstein and other favorite sources “vet stories that mentioned them, letting them make adjustments,” according to Los Angeles Magazine. The relationship was so cozy that Weinstein requested Bart’s presence at a Variety interview even though Bart wasn’t the one conducting it. One day before the New Yorker posted its investigation into Weinstein’s transgressions, former Variety columnist Anne Thompson detailed the odd arrangement in a column.

“When I went to Cannes as a Variety columnist and tried to set up a feature interview with Harvey on the Weinsteins’ slate, he insisted that Variety editor Peter Bart and his lieutenant Tim Grey be present to make sure the publication took care of him,” she wrote.

The feeling was much the same on the Miramax side. One publicist who did work for Miramax told HuffPost that Bart “was very much in the court.” Bart was what was considered a “FOH,” or “Friend of Harvey,” the publicist said.

“Peter thought he was a kingmaker,” a former Variety editor said. “He thought he was like one of these moguls. He talked about himself that way. He would boast about being with them, hanging out with them, being shown an early cut of a movie ― stuff like that.”   

Over time, the transactional nature of Bart and Weinstein’s relationship became plain to see, even in the pages of Variety itself. In 1997, they hosted a cocktail party together to celebrate Fifty Years of Sun, Sex & Celluloid, a book about the Cannes Film Festival written by Bart and his Variety editors for Weinstein’s Miramax Books.

“The book was going to be called ‘Fifty Years of Sun & Celluloid,’ but I decided to insert the word sex into the title,” Weinstein joked at the party, according to an item written in Bart’s magazine.

Two years later, on the 10th anniversary of Bart taking over Variety, Weinstein threw him a party to commemorate his decade in charge of the magazine.

Koones, the former Variety publisher, denied that Bart played favorites. “I got studio heads calling me to bitch about him all the time,” he told HuffPost.

Did that include Weinstein?

“Oh, I think so. I think so. I don’t remember specifically,” Koones said. “You know, I think Harvey bitched about Peter’s coverage on occasion, sure. I think that the notion that Peter was in anybody’s back pocket is bullshit. I was there. It didn’t happen. It just didn’t happen. People have been saying that for years and years.”

“Look, I understand. Did Harvey throw a party for Peter? Yeah, he did,” Koones added. “And you know, if I was a reporter, I’d probably ask the same question.”

I think Harvey bitched about Peter’s coverage on occasion, sure. I think that the notion that Peter was in anybody’s back pocket is bullshit. Charlie Koones, former Variety publisher

In September 2001, Amy Wallace published a devastating profile of Bart in Los Angeles Magazine. It was titled “Is Peter Bart the Most Hated Man in Hollywood?

The profile begins with a paranoid Bart on the phone with Wallace, threatening to sue. She proceeds to depict him as racist and anti-Semitic, as well as a possible fabulist and serial liar. “If a reporter or an editor at a major daily newspaper [flouted] the basic rules of journalism the way Bart does, they’d be shown the door,” Wallace wrote.

Wallace also detailed Bart’s conflicts of interest within the industry for the first time, reporting that he seemed to have shopped a script ― she had the script ― and was known to let people like Weinstein tweak stories before they were published: “When confronted by the reporters whose bylines topped the altered stories, Bart would say he got better information after deadline. ‘This is my paper,’ one remembers him saying. ‘I’ll do as I please.’”

Wallace’s story earned Bart a 21-day suspension and led the owners of Variety to launch an investigation into the article’s allegations with the help of outside counsel. Ultimately, the investigators said they “found no evidence that Peter abused his power or influence as editor,” and he was allowed to return as editor-in-chief. Two years later, Miramax published Bart’s book Dangerous Company, and Variety threw a party for the Weinstein brothers.

To mark its 100th anniversary in 2005, Variety invited Harvey Weinstein to talk about what he thought of the trade publication. “In terms of quality entertainment trade magazines, Variety is the best,” Weinstein said. “I think there is something to be said by the fact that entertainment insiders as well as people outside the industry keep up with their entertainment news on a daily basis by reading Variety. The reporters do a great job researching the facts for their news stories and the columnists have very interesting perspectives and insights into the business.”

Miramax was again boosting Bart’s wallet in 2006, when it published another of his splashy Hollywood books. After Bart finally stepped down as Variety editor-in-chief in 2009, he again contracted with Weinstein to write another book. He called it Infamous Players.  

Harvey Weinstein and Peter Bart attend the launch party for Bart's book Infamous Players. The party was hosted by The Weinstein Company.

Even in his emeritus years, Bart could be counted on to defend Weinstein’s honor. In 2013, he wrote a column lambasting Oscars host Seth MacFarlane for joking that the five best supporting actress nominees would “no longer have to pretend to be attracted to Harvey Weinstein.” (MacFarlane recently explained that the joke “came from a place of loathing and anger” after his friend told him about unwanted advances from Weinstein.)

In an email to HuffPost, Bart called the charge that he had ever banned negative stories about Weinstein “ridiculous.”

“Anyone checking Variety could find an abundance of negative pieces on Miramax,” he wrote. Reading through Variety’s archives, the coverage appeared overwhelmingly positive. When we asked Bart for critical stories he was most proud of, he said he didn’t have time to cooperate fully. “I have meetings and screenings tomorrow and I won’t be able to do this intelligently,” he responded. “Besides which I don’t see a need to defend myself against anonymous critics.” 

Bart also suggested that he hadn’t written for Miramax during his time at Variety. (He had.)

“As for books, my books were published by Simon & Schuster, Putnam, St Martins, Linden Press, etc long before Miramax asked to publish Infamous Players, by which time I was no longer editor in chief,” Bart wrote. 

In a phone interview, Bart said he had “never received whistleblowers’ comments” about Weinstein’s sexual transgressions. “Wish I had,” he added.

Instead, Bart said that he and his reporters had heard about “business issues” involving the mogul, like “directors who felt that he intruded upon the final cut.”

So nothing about sexual assault?

“No, I never got that,” Bart said. “Had I, we would have run it.” 

Know anything we should know? Email us at jason.cherkis@huffpost.com or maxwell@huffpost.com.

Thanks To #MeToo, The Feminist Movement Is Experiencing Something Magical Right Now

$
0
0
Image used for representational purpose.

Social media is a strange beast. Ask anyone who's spent any time on it and they'll give you enough examples that show the depths of human depravity. Expletives, abuses, character assassination, slander and violent threats are all par for the course if you regularly inhabit the online world. One's chances of experiencing all of these, sometimes simultaneously, increase exponentially if one is a woman, with an opinion on matters that affect her physical, mental and emotional well-being.

Which is why it's like a shot of oxygen for a person gasping for air on the rare occasions that the incredible power of social media is harnessed to bring about a positive social change.

In the last couple of days, the feminist movement around the world has experienced something magical. And it started with a simple enough idea — joining hands, virtually.

Hollywood has been under intense scrutiny for creating a toxic environment that breeds sexual predators, allowing them to sexually harass women with impunity.

For almost a fortnight now, Hollywood has been under intense scrutiny for creating a toxic environment that breeds sexual predators, allowing them to harass women in the industry with impunity. One of its doyens, Harvey Weinstein, has been accused of sexual harassment and rape by multiple actresses, his own employees and other film industry workers over the course of three decades, stirring a global debate about power structures in social and professional settings that allow rampant abuse and ill-treatment of women.

As more and more industry insiders came forward with their stories of abuse, on 16 October, actress Alyssa Milano called on all the people who had ever been assaulted or harassed to tweet with #MeToo to help others understand the scale of the problem of sexual abuse — across sexual and gender identities.

And social media responded in a spectacularly unexpected way. Not just women, but people from every gender and sexual orientation from across the world came together in a bittersweet, cathartic, heartbreaking show of solidarity as stories of abuse tumbled out on social media platforms, after months, years and decades of silence and internalised shame. Twitter confirmed that within 24 hours, #MeToo had been tweeted nearly half a million times.

It was evident that sexual abuse is a malaise that cuts across caste, class and professional barriers, as women from all walks of life talked about experiences that were scarily similar.

Social media is not new to conversations about sexual violence, but for the most part, they are limited to a handful of feminists ploughing on in the face of ridicule and threats. The global show of solidarity we have witnessed since Milano's tweet is as unprecedented as it is important.

For the last few days, Indian twitter has been abuzz with a case not dissimilar to Weinstein. Multiple women from Pune levelled accusations of sexual harassment and misconduct against Khodu Irani, the owner of High Spirits, a popular local night club.

Refusing to back down even when High Spirits staunchly rubbished the accusations, several women shared screenshots of their alleged conversations with Irani, in most of which he is seen making unsolicited sexual advances. Presently, there are roughly 30 accusations against Irani. High Spirits, however, continues to be operational and hold events.

The furore over the matter, with dozens of men indirectly defending Irani by questioning why women continued to go there despite the unbridled harassment being an open secret, prompted a former employee to write a detailed blog on Medium explaining how Irani's entire eco-system — the staff, his friends, and regulars at the club had, over the years, thoroughly normalised the culture of abuse and objectification. Even as several women employees routinely suffered mental and emotional breakdowns from the stress of grappling with the way they felt, they found themselves justifying Irani's behaviour due to years of gaslighting and having the veracity of their lived experiences questioned.

Ask any victim of sexual abuse and they will tell you that not being believed can be almost as devastating as the experience of abuse itself.

Creating and cementing a culture of silence is the most effective way of ensuring that the status quo is never challenged.

We all know that it's happening to all women, everywhere, in every space they occupy, but the magnitude of the problem of sexual violence and the enormous impact it has on every woman's experience of life continues to be ignored or shrouded in secrecy. Creating and cementing a culture of silence is the most effective way of ensuring that the status quo is never challenged, giving men the right to treat women and their bodies with unchecked entitlement.

Which is why, when women band together, refusing to be shouted down or talked over, making it their mission to ensure that, for once, the victims' voices are louder than the aggressors', no matter how big or small the transgression, it is a giant stride in the right direction.

As is the nature of social media, eventually the tweets, retweets and status updates will wane and be reduced to a trickle. And yes, soon enough, our shrinking attention spans will force us to divert our energies to the next and the new; but for now, it is the moment of all the women who were too scared, too ashamed, too something to come together to find strength in one another and reclaim some part of their narratives by simply saying #MeToo.

Also on HuffPost

Google Maps Just Food-Shamed Its Users With A Calorie Counter

$
0
0

Google Maps just took a very wrong turn.

A now-defunct feature on the app calculated the amount of calories a user would burn if they opted to walk instead of drive to their destination. It even went so far as to figure out how many mini cupcakes’ worth of calories they would burn.

It’s unclear how Google could even determine how many calories a given person might burn on a walk without knowing their age, height, weight or speed (HuffPost’s request for comment from the tech giant was not immediately answered). 

But regardless of the technical details, the idea of shoving calories in the face of anyone who is simply looking for directions is completely misguided ― especially considering the more than 20 million women and 10 million men in the United States who will suffer from an eating disorder in their lifetime, according to the National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA).

“Framing exercise as a calorie burner and a way to earn food ‘rewards’ can be triggering for those are risk for eating disorders, as well as those are struggling with these illnesses and trying to recover,” Claire Mysko, CEO of NEDA told HuffPost. “It reinforces the hyper focus on numbers and the dangerous fixation on reward and punishment that can fuel these complex illnesses.”

Google told Buzzfeed on Monday it would remove the feature from its app that evening, citing “strong user feedback.” But for what it’s worth, we still saw it active on an iPhone as of Tuesday at 12:45 p.m.: 

 And it certainly wasn’t removed before social media had a chance to respond. 

Dr. Allison K. Chase, executive director of the Eating Recovery Center in Austin, Texas, echoed the sentiment that the feature ― which The Hill reporter Taylor Lorenz tweeted there was no way to turn off ― can impact both people who currently suffer from an eating disorder and those who are in recovery. 

“For those that suffer from an eating disorder, it can contribute to the obsession associated with counting calories consumed and burned,” she said. “This can further the impact of the disorder, as well as negatively impact those that are in treatment and attempting to move towards recovery from this potentially deadly mental disorder.”

If you or someone you know is suffering from an eating disorder, there are many resources available to you. Visit NEDA or the Eating Recovery Center’s websites for more information.

 

Also on HuffPost
Eating Disorder Survivors On What Recovery Means To Them

Federal Court Blocks Donald Trump's Latest Travel Ban

$
0
0

A federal court in Hawaii blocked President Donald Trump’s third and most extensive initiative to limit travel into the United States on Tuesday, just hours before it was set to go into effect.

The International Refugee Assistance Project, the Iranian Alliances Across Borders and various individual plaintiffs, including the state of Hawaii, filed lawsuits in Hawaii and Maryland after the travel ban ― which would indefinitely ban citizens from Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen from entering the country ― was announced on Sept. 24. They view this ban as yet another thinly veiled attempt to target Muslims (six out of the eight countries on the list are Muslim-majority).

“EO-3 suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor: it lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from six specified countries would be ‘detrimental to the interests of the United States,’” the court order said. The ban also “plainly discriminates based on nationality in the manner that the Ninth Circuit has found antithetical to both Section 1152(a) and the founding principles of this Nation.”

Non-visa holders from most of the countries listed have already been banned for the last several months, after the Supreme Court ruled to allow parts of a previous travel ban to go into effect in June. The latest initiative removed Sudan from the list, and added Chad, North Korea and Venezuela. It was planned to go into effect Wednesday.

The changes were interpreted by many as mere political posturing ― an attempt to make the ban appear less overtly targeted toward Muslims

“This is the third time we feel compelled to ask the courts to block the President’s Muslim ban,” Becca Heller, head of the International Refugee Assistant Project, said Monday. “Each new version is just an updated version of the previous ones, and they all have one goal: to keep out people primarily from majority-Muslim countries. Any supposed national security goals are not based in fact. Instead, millions of people will be harmed indefinitely, including American families and institutions. We will not rest until this cruel and senseless policy is blocked for good.”

The same court had also blocked the second order from going into effect in March. 

A White House statement released Tuesday afternoon called the court order “dangerously flawed” and noted the travel ban was issued after an “extensive worldwide security review.”

“The entry restrictions in the proclamation apply to countries based on their inability or unwillingness to share critical information necessary to safely vet applications, as well as a threat assessment related to terrorism, instability, and other grave national security concerns,” the White House said. “These restrictions are vital to ensuring that foreign nations comply with the minimum security standards required for the integrity of our immigration system and the security of our Nation.”

The Department of Homeland Security “will comply with any lawful judicial order,” acting secretary Elaine Duke said in a statement, adding that they “look forward to prevailing in this matter upon appeal.” She said the “requirements are essential to securing the homeland.”

This new order doesn’t directly implicate the U.S. refugee resettlement program because the Trump administration had already taken measures to limit the number of refugees able to seek safety in the country. The 120-day suspension included in the second iteration of the ban expires on Oct. 24. Experts don’t think the White House will replace it with a new refugee ban because the administration already slashed the annual resettlement ceiling to 45,000 for fiscal year 2018, the lowest it’s been since the program’s inception in 1980.

The series of limits placed on immigration places tens of thousands of people already in the resettlement pipeline in limbo. Plus, it precludes so many more from being able to begin the process. 

For Amir Abbasi, 33, the uncertainty has been excruciating. (He asked for his name to be changed out of fear of persecution by authorities in his home country.) He and his partner fled Iran due to the persecution they faced for being gay. They illegally traveled to Turkey in 2014 and first went through the Canadian refugee pipeline.

They were told the country couldn’t handle any more cases, so earlier this year they began the process with the U.S. program. After one pre-screening interview, they stopped hearing from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

He no longer holds hope that his U.S. application will lead to anything, he said. He doesn’t know where to go or what to do.

“Life in Turkey is very hard,” he said. “We don’t have any access to job markets legally. Most LGBT refugees don’t have access to funds from their families. And if you work illegally you might be arrested and you might be deported to Iran.”

Omar Jadwat, who is the director of the American Civil Liberty Union’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and was among those arguing the case in Maryland, called Trump’s ban “illegal and unconstitutional.” 

“We’re glad, but not surprised, that President Trump’s illegal and unconstitutional Muslim ban has been blocked once again,” Jadwat said. “Like the plaintiffs in the Hawaii case, we are working to ensure the ban never takes effect.”

An activist in Los Angeles holds a sign on Oct. 15 during a protest against President Donald Trump's travel ban. 

Ashley Graham Has A Powerful Message After Getting Dumped For Her Size

$
0
0

Ashley Graham has one seriously inspiring breakup story. 

The supermodel, who’s broken down barriers in the fashion industry with her curves and cover girl looks, recently spoke about body confidence, breakups and self love at Glamour’s International Day of the Girl event.

At the age of 16, the curve model says she fell for a skater boy named Craig. Three months into the relationship, he broke up with her. 

“He told me that we had to break up because I wasn’t going to have sex with him,” Graham tells the audience of girls ― who pretty much all shout out in dismay over the revelation.

“But wait for it!” Graham says. “The second reason was because he said I was going to be as fat as his mom.”

Bad call, Craig. Thirteen years later, Graham is not only a role model for women of all sizes, she’s got killer career, too: The 29-year-old’s successes include countless magazine covers (including Vogue and Sports Illustrated), a co-hosting gig on “America’s Next Top Model,” a lingerie collection and a clothing line.

“I think about that [breakup] from time to time, and if I could go back and talk to [myself then], I would say: First of all, Craig is a loser,she tells the audience. “Second of all, you is fine. And that bulge on your hip ― not only is it OK, but it’s going to change the world some day.” 

“Craig made me feel worthless, he made me feel that my body was nothing,” Graham says. 

Now, she’s married to Justin Irvin, a man she says loves her for exactly who she is, inside and out. What’s more, she loves herself for exactly who she is. 

“You are the key to your own happiness,” she tells the girls. “I thought I could get happiness from dudes like Craig. Honestly, the more attention that I got from men, the more I thought I had value. But it wasn’t always the right kind of attention and it wasn’t always the right kind of man.”

“It took me a long time to figure out where happiness comes from, but honestly, happiness comes from doing what you love,” Graham says, reminding the young audience that they have plenty of time to figure that out. 

Watch the clip above for Graham’s inspiring speech. 

Also on HuffPost
Ashley Graham

Jennifer Lawrence Recalls Standing In 'Degrading' Nude Lineup For Audition

$
0
0

Jennifer Lawrence has gone through many a gauntlet on-screen, but nothing could compare to the “degrading” and “humiliating” experiences she faced early on in her career. 

The “mother!” star was among a handful of actresses honored at Elle‘s Women in Hollywood event Monday night, where she took the stage to make a plea to end sexual harassment in the film industry following the mounting allegations against producer Harvey Weinstein

While Lawrence has stated that she never personally witnessed his abuse, the type of behavior described by the many women accusing him unfortunately runs rampant in Hollywood. 

“When I was much younger and starting out, I was told by the producers of a film to lose 15 pounds in two weeks,” she recalled. “One girl before me had already been fired for not losing enough weight fast enough, and during this time a female producer had me do a nude lineup with about five women who were much, much thinner than me. And we all stood side-by-side with only paste-ons covering our privates.”

“After that degrading and humiliating lineup, the female producer told me I should use the naked photos of myself as inspiration for my diet,” she continued, finding the humor in the ridiculous situation. 

“I can laugh now, it’s OK,” she said. 

When Lawrence tried to advocate for herself, sharing her experience with both the producer and director of the project, she was given no support. 

“He asked me to star in a porno as the character, among many other things that are too inappropriate to repeat here in this dress,” she said of the director’s reaction, according to USA Today

As for the producer’s response? “He said he didn’t know why everyone thought I was so fat, he thought I was ‘perfectly f**kable.’”

At the time, Lawrence admits she was “trapped” given how desperately she wanted a career as a film actress, choosing to remain silent instead of sharing the harassment with the media.

Jennifer Lawrence attends ELLE's 24th Annual Women in Hollywood Celebration.

The floodgates, however, have since been opened in the wake of Weinstein’s scandal, as women across the film industry are telling their own stories of abuse, something Lawrence describes as “oddly unifying.”

Dozens of women, including actresses Ashley Judd, Mira Sorvino and Gwyneth Paltrow, have accused the producer of sexual misconduct, prompting his firing from The Weinstein Company and expulsion from the Academy earlier this month. While Weinstein denies that any of sexual encounters weren’t consensual, damning investigative reports by The New York Times and The New Yorker detailing decades of abuse paint a different picture.

“It’s so fundamental to the female experience to be mistreated and feel ashamed of it,” she said. “In a dream world, everyone is treated with the same amount of respect. But until we reach that goal, I will lend my ear, I will lend my voice to any boy, girl, man or woman who does not feel like they can protect themselves.”

“I stand here today to bring the message home and into the hearts of everyone who has felt threatened in this industry,” she concluded. “We will stop normalizing these horrific situations.”

Also on HuffPost
Jennifer Lawrence Through the Years

21 Emotional Wedding Moments That Moved The Photographer To Tears

$
0
0

Professional wedding photographers regularly witness powerful displays of love and emotion as part of their job. So when the person behind the camera starts crying, you know there’s some seriously sentimental stuff unfolding before their eyes. 

We asked photogs to share with us a wedding moment that moved them to tears. Below, 21 poignant images and the beautiful, and sometimes heartbreaking, stories behind them. 

  • 1
    Ashley Gerrity Photography
    "This moment had me struggling to see straight through my camera. While planning her wedding, my bride's mother passed away and the whole day was full of mixed emotions of sadness and joy.  In her memory, the couple had placed a large framed photograph of the mother of the bride in her seat, which is not uncommon. The moment that caught me off-guard was during the wedding ceremony when I stepped behind the altar to catch an alternate angle of the vows and saw the father of the bride, resting his hand on the frame, just as he would have held her hand had she been there. As he teared up, so did I." -- Ashley Gerrity
  • 2
    Bergreen Photography
    "This couple had a small, intimate wedding ceremony with only their immediate families present. When they shared their vows, they were extremely heartfelt and personal. There was no fanfare or performance. The groom spoke first to his mom and then to his soon-to-be wife. He shared thoughts from a letter he had written to his mom about how he had found the love of his life. It showed the depth of his love and the thought that went into his relationship. The respect and love he had for the important women in his life was touching and enough to bring tears to our eyes." --  Marc and Brenda Bergreen
  • 3
    Lieb Photographic
    "Sophia and Sean had decided to give each other gifts before seeing each other for their first look. When Sophia opened her gift from Sean, she saw it was a scrapbook. The minute I saw her bring her hand up to her mouth and her eyes begin to fill with tears, I could barely see through the viewfinder myself. Sean had given her a scrapbook filled to the brim with memories they had shared together with the promise of many more." -- Michelle Lieb
  • 4
    Nick and Lauren Photography
    "Matthew and Jamie are two gorgeous people with hearts made of gold, and seeing them walk down the aisle with their two little girls, pure happiness radiating on their faces as they were about to exchange their words of devotion -- there wasn't a single dry eye in sight. There's just something so captivating about two people who love each other so deeply that their own joy and emotions make you feel warm and fuzzy inside." -- Lauren Laveria
  • 5
    Nicole Chan Photography
    "Robert and Meg met each other 30+ years ago. They had a great love, broke up, lost touch, married other people, had adventures and families, suffered losses, and then – when they were both were single again and had comfortably accepted that it was their destiny to be alone – found each other again." -- Nicole Chan
  • 6
    Banga Studios
    "Vinita hugging her brother (with her father in the background) after her wedding ceremony. It's a traditional part of the Sikh ceremony where the bride's family does a farewell called the 'doli'." -- Gurminder Banga
  • 7
    Darling Photography
    "Lydia and Brandon tied the knot with Brandon’s adorable 7-year old-daughter in tow. Lydia wrote special vows just for her and read them during the ceremony. Not a dry eye in the crowd -- including me." -- Jennifer Smith
  • 8
    James Day Photography
    "I said to [the groom] Adrian, 'I have a question for you, but I want you to tell the answer to Roslyn and not me.' I continued, 'Out of the billions of people on the planet, you've chosen to spend the rest of your life with Roslyn. Can you tell her why?' In a matter of moments I could start seeing Roslyn's eyes glisten, then the most beautiful tears streamed down her face. Then I found myself crying. Oh love, you are oh so precious." -- James Day 
  • 9
    Leah Moyers Photography
    "Karen and Becky planned a Christmas wedding at their church where they were finally able to marry after a decades-long romance. I cried behind my camera during the entire ceremony and a guest towards the back of the church offered me tissues." -- Leah Moyers 
  • 10
    The Hearnes
    "I almost always cry during ceremonies, but this moment especially got ahold of me because of the sweet connection Jena, the bride, had with her dad! He spent months building this treehouse deck and clearing some of his land for their wedding and everything was so beautiful. It was a huge labor of love and he dreamed about walking her down to her groom the whole time he built it. To see the pride and love on his face during that moment, and the loving look on her face seeing her groom, it completely took my breath away!" -- Abbi Hearne
  • 11
    Promessa Studios
    "Britt and Allison were so excited to share their day with their favorite people in their favorite place on the Cape. They even spent months handpicking a postcard for each guest for their escort cards and wrote a personalized note on the back of every one! After months and months of hard work, their day had arrived. The morning of, they got ready in adjacent rooms so they could surprise each other. As Britt walked up to Allison for their first look, I saw that Allison was trying to hold it together but as soon as she saw her beautiful bride, that overwhelming feeling gave way." -- Karen Eng
  • 12
    Priyanca Rao
    "This picture, taken at a father-daughter first look, made me cry not once, but twice. When the bride's father walked in the room and saw his daughter in her wedding dress, he was immediately overcome with emotions. The bride thanked her father for the dress and for giving her the dream wedding. In return, he simply said thank you for being such a wonderful daughter. Later on, when I was in the car with the bride, she shared the story of her dress and how she had been to so many stores to find the perfect one. The one designer store she had not been to yet (but was totally in love with) was very expensive, and she thought she couldn’t afford anything there. When her father heard of this, he took her there and bought both his daughters and his wife outfits from their favorite designer. Seeing this outfit on her was so overwhelming for him as well as for her." -- Priyanca Rao
  • 13
    Steph Grant Photography
    "This wedding was like a dream and definitely made me cry. Some of these people you see in these photos were their friends but many were random onlookers at Burning Man. The emotion and connection was unreal. Magical. You can feel the love in the photos." -- Steph Grant
  • 14
    Jill Tiongco Photography
    "The bride and groom sat back-to-back on a swing so they wouldn't see each other, as they read love letters to each other before getting married. It was the sweetest thing ever ." -- Jill Tiongco
  • 15
    Justin Haugen
    "I was ugly-crying at this moment. Backstory: Three years ago, my friend passed away before he knew he was about to become a father to this beautiful little girl. Tomás delivered his vows to Fina and her 2-year-old daughter, promising to honor her father and always be her daddy." -- Justin Haugen
  • 16
    Liv Lyszyk
    "Brit and Lisa's daughter gave a toast at their wedding. She made a moving speech, noting how they've always felt like family, and it only feels right that it's official. There were tears from everyone, but especially her moms." -- Liv Lyszyk
  • 17
    Phosart Photography and Cinematography
    “As familiar as we get with emotional moments at weddings, there is always something very touching when the groom cries.” -- George Fotopoulos
  • 18
    Brian Mullins
    "I have a younger daughter so when the daughter and dad see each other on the wedding day is such a special moment for me. The bride got ready at her parents' house and she walked down the stairs to see her dad. I always try to talk with Dad prior so he knows this is the last moments he gets to spend with his daughter before she's married, so to enjoy it and don’t be afraid to show emotion. So the bride is crying, the dad is crying, and I am crying. Thank god for autofocus." -- Brian Mullins
  • 19
    Rob Greer Photography
    "This image shows a simple moment between a mother and her son during their reception dance. But I was crying as I took it, as were all family members witnessing this moment. Just days before the wedding, the groom’s mother discovered that her brain cancer was inoperable and that she only had weeks to live. She didn’t want to impact her son’s wedding, so she shared the news with the immediate family, but not with her son, the groom. I was told the news when I arrived to photograph the wedding and I spent the day trying to keep it together as I tried my best to create important photographs." -- Rob Greer 
  • 20
    Mari Harsan Studios
    "The couple giving the toast is a simple photograph, but during that speech they announced that all the gifts and proceeds from their wedding will be donated to help kids in Nepal get a better education. I thought this was so absolutely selfless and thoughtful for such a young couple." -- Mari Harsan
  • 21
    True Photography
    "This was the moment Kate turned around and saw Natasha in her dress for the first time. She was full of emotion to see her beautiful bride, and there truly wasn't a dry eye around!" -- True Photography
Also on HuffPost
Emotional Wedding First Look Photos

India Must Empower, And Build Disaster Resilient Communities

$
0
0

by Jim Wungramyao Kasom

October 13 was observed worldwide as the International Day for Disaster Reduction. Started in 1989 by the UN General Assembly to promote a global culture of risk-awareness and disaster reduction, it calls for more attention than ever before, with the increasing number of disasters that we are facing now.

This year's theme to mark the International Day for Disaster Reduction is reducing the number of affected people by disasters, by 2030. This leads us to the question: how prepared and resilient is India to achieve the target? My recent trip to Bihar post the flood has raised more doubts rather than answered the question.

In August, Bihar experienced floods triggered by the incessant rains in the northern region of the state and Nepal. According to the official data, 482 people lost their lives and around 17 million were affected. While more than 7,00,000 people were evacuated, 230,000 people took shelter in 1,085 relief camps. In West Bengal the death toll reached 152, with more than 10 million people affected, and over 3,00,000 hectares of farmland was submerged. Assam recorded a death toll of 157 people, 3.2 million people in 25 districts were affected, and around 1,79, 000 hectares of crop area was damaged.

The day we landed in Kubaul Musahri Tole village, it had become an island and it took a 30-minute boat ride to reach it. Food, and other necessities, were y hard to find. As our assessment team collected names of beneficiaries from each household, I ran into 26-year-old Naresh, who lost his 50-year old father, an asthma patient during the floods. Sharing his loss, Naresh said, "my father had asthma, he was unwell and weak. However, we couldn't go to the market to buy medicines as our house was surrounded by water." The saddest part was that even the village burial ground was flooded. So, they took his father's body and laid him on the only protruding patch of land and covered the body with water hyacinth. "What could we do? We could not afford wood and there was no dry land for the burial" said a local volunteer

It is hard to forget our helplessness, and the anguish we experienced. The impact of flood tends to be highlighted in numbers: size, cost, etc, a figure you can count or calculate. But it is the stories of lives affected that strongly capture your heart and mind, compelling you to delve deeper into the situation.

Children are the most affected during floods. Their safety is a major challenge, and most of them usually suffer from waterborne disease either during or after the disaster.

In Sirsia, almost all the 150 households moved up to the road while their homes were still under waist deep water. At the relief camp, I met 22-year-old Sushila who had recently lost her baby. When the flood submerged their house she was due to deliver, and was taken to a government hospital at Kiratpur where she gave birth to a 1.2 kg baby. According to local leaders, she was forced by the hospital authorities to take the baby home as there was no space, even though the baby was weak and was suffering from jaundice. The baby died the very next day in their makeshift camp.

"The flood water came so suddenly I couldn't even salvage my school bag," said, 14-year-old Prabhu, one of the few school going children from Sirsia village. In the camp, his family was worried about food and shelter, and how they will cope post the floods. They had lost almost everything to the floods. Children are the most affected during floods. Their safety is a major challenge, and most of them usually suffer from waterborne disease either during or after the disaster.

Each person affected by the flood has a story to narrate, and every story reveals the pain they experience in the aftermath of a natural disaster. But are the people in power who takes critical decisions in the country listening to them? Can they listen to the stories of affected people such Naresh, Sushila, and Prabhu?

India needs serious and committed leaders who can change the course of ongoing dialogues on climate change and disasters risk reduction. It's about time that we build disaster resilient communities so that those affected do not become a mere statistic.

Jim Wungramyao Kasom is a Communication Associate with World Vision India.

The opinions expressed in this post are the personal views of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of HuffPost India. Any omissions or errors are the author's and HuffPost India does not assume any liability or responsibility for them.

10 Comics That Perfectly Capture The Comfortable Stage Of Relationships

$
0
0

The honeymoon phase in a relationship is overrated; the comfortable stage is where the fun is really at. Just ask illustrator Mary Park. 

On her Instagram account Murrz Studio, the Los Angeles-based artist chronicles what it’s like to be in love with someone you’re completely at ease stealing food from: 

Or sitting naked in front of the AC with on a particularly hot day: 

In an interview with HuffPost, Park says the comics are inspired by her relationship with her boyfriend, who she’s been with for nine years. 

“Murz and her boyfriend are goofy and easygoing, because that’s really how we are in real life,” she said. “We’re just two big kids who are trying to ‘adult’ together! We annoy each other constantly but never want to be apart.”

Park also tries to depict her comic alter-ego doing gross stuff ― texting while pooping, for instance ― to prove a point. 

“As a woman, I wanted to illustrate to the world that we are not always butterflies and roses and fairy dust, but we’re humans too,” she said. “We have our gross moments. It’s not always pretty or perfect.”

She added: “I also wanted to show the man’s perspective of what loving and living with a woman is like ― at least a woman like me!”

To see more of Park’s relatable relationship comics, scroll down or follow her on Instagram

  • Murrz Studio
  • Murrz Studio
  • Murrz Studio
  • Murrz Studio
  • Murrz Studio
  • Murrz Studio
  • Murrz Studio
Also on HuffPost
Viewing all 37249 articles
Browse latest View live